DOJ Shifts Resources to Target Tariff Evasion
Litigation Alert
Last week, sources within the Department of Justice (DOJ) signaled a reorganization designed to help the agency focus its enforcement of criminal customs fraud and tariff avoidance schemes. A reported expansion and reconfiguration of the DOJ's Market Integrity and Major Frauds (MIMF) Unit would focus on trade fraud and white collar crimes affecting investors and consumers. The roughly 35-lawyer MIMF Unit now stands to be supplemented with additional personnel from the DOJ Consumer Protection Branch and the expanded group would be renamed the Market, Government, Consumer Fraud Unit. This shift of key DOJ resources to investigate and prosecute tariff evasion represents a significant change for the MIMF Unit, which traditionally focused on procurement fraud and market manipulation, but is part and parcel with the DOJ's broader enforcement strategy.
The changes to the revamped MIMF Unit are the latest in a series of moves showing President Trump's focus on global trade relations and combatting tariff evasion. The Trump administration has repeatedly promised to enforce tariffs aggressively, including through the False Claims Act (FCA) and criminal prosecution, with DOJ criminal and civil fraud efforts at the forefront of that endeavor. In May 2025, Matthew R. Galeotti, Head of the DOJ Criminal Division, announced that his unit would prioritize "trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion." We have previously covered the DOJ's increasing focus on prosecuting customs fraud through the FCA here, here, and here.
Increased investigations and prosecutions of customs issues undoubtedly are underway already. Reports indicate that the new unit is prioritizing cases involving long-running fraud, senior executives, and large volumes of alleged losses from unlawful tariff evasion schemes, and the DOJ is already receiving whistleblower tips and voluntary disclosures linked to trade fraud.
While enforcement certainly will focus on violators of the newly implemented tariffs imposed by the present administration, enforcement is also likely to extend beyond such violations. For example, the DOJ recently has pursued FCA violations related to long-standing import duties, such as anti-dumping orders. Furthermore, earlier this year, the DOJ reached a settlement with a wood flooring company based on allegations that the company evaded customs duties, anti-dumping and countervailing duties, and section 301 tariffs. This is not entirely new – in the past five years, the DOJ also reached settlements with companies accused of underpaying duties after misclassifying imports, knowingly submitting incorrect valuation information on customs documents, and manipulating product descriptions to avoid duties. Nevertheless, the DOJ's recent reorganization shows the Trump administration's heightened focus on combatting customs fraud.
Miller & Chevalier has experience in both FCA litigation and customs law, and is available to assist clients with this evolving landscape. For more information, please contact:
Joshua Drew, jdrew@milchev.com, 202-626-5811
Richard A. Mojica, rmojica@milchev.com, 202-626-1571
Bradley E. Markano, bmarkano@milchev.com, 202-626-6061
Peter Kentz, pkentz@milchev.com, 202-626-5891
The information contained in this communication is not intended as legal advice or as an opinion on specific facts. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. For more information, please contact one of the senders or your existing Miller & Chevalier lawyer contact. The invitation to contact the firm and its lawyers is not to be construed as a solicitation for legal work. Any new lawyer-client relationship will be confirmed in writing.
This, and related communications, are protected by copyright laws and treaties. You may make a single copy for personal use. You may make copies for others, but not for commercial purposes. If you give a copy to anyone else, it must be in its original, unmodified form, and must include all attributions of authorship, copyright notices, and republication notices. Except as described above, it is unlawful to copy, republish, redistribute, and/or alter this presentation without prior written consent of the copyright holder.