New CAAs on Exchange of CbC Reports Pushes Total to 20
The IRS has concluded competent authority arrangements (“CAAs”) for the exchange of country-by-country (“CbC”) reports with Australia and the United Kingdom. The CAA with Australia was signed in Australia on July 14 and by the United States on August 1. The CAA with the United Kingdom was signed on August 16. The new arrangements bring the number of CAAs for the exchange of CbC reports to 20. The CAAs for the exchange of CbC reports generally require the competent authorities of the foreign country and the United States to exchange annually, on an automatic basis, CbC reports received from each reporting entity that is a tax resident in its jurisdiction, provided that one or more constituent entities of the reporting entity’s group is a tax resident in the other jurisdiction, or is subject to tax with respect to the business carried out through a permanent establishment in the other jurisdiction. In the United States, CbC reporting is required for U.S. persons that are the ultimate parent entity of a multinational enterprise (“MNE”) with revenue of $850 million or more in the preceding accounting year, for reporting years beginning on or after June 30, 2016, under the IRS’s final regulations issued last summer (see prior coverage). Reporting entities must file a new Form 8975 (“Country by Country Report”) and Schedule A to Form 8975 (“Tax Jurisdiction and Constituent Entity Information”). In Revenue Procedure 2017-23, the IRS announced that U.S. MNEs may voluntarily file Form 8975 with the IRS for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and before June 30, 2016. U.S. MNEs that do not voluntarily file with the IRS may be subject to CbC reporting in foreign jurisdictions in which they have constituent entities. A CAA generally must be in force with a foreign jurisdiction for CbC reports filed with the IRS by a U.S. MNE to satisfy the CbC reporting requirements under foreign law. This has raised concerns about the pace at which the IRS has concluded CAA negotiations with foreign jurisdictions. Many foreign jurisdictions that have adopted CbC reporting requirements under the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action 13 have done so with respect to reporting years beginning on or after January 1, 2016. Most of those countries have signed a multilateral CAA, but the United States has chosen instead to pursue bilateral CAAs with each foreign jurisdiction—likely due to U.S. concerns regarding the use of the information contained in the CbC reports and potential public disclosure of the information. The U.S. CAAs are substantially similar to the multilateral CAA, but numerous foreign jurisdictions have not yet signed a bilateral CAA with the IRS, including China, France, Germany, Mexico, and Japan. The IRS maintains a status table of foreign jurisdictions on its CbC Reporting page. With voluntary reporting for early reporting periods set to begin on September 1, U.S. MNEs should monitor continuing developments to determine whether delays in the U.S. CAA process may necessitate the filing of CbC reports in foreign jurisdictions.
This, and related communications, are protected by copyright laws and treaties. You may make a single copy for personal use. You may make copies for others, but not for commercial purposes. If you give a copy to anyone else, it must be in its original, unmodified form, and must include all attributions of authorship, copyright notices, and republication notices. Except as described above, it is unlawful to copy, republish, redistribute, and/or alter this presentation without prior written consent of the copyright holder.