Strategies for Responding to FRCP 30(b)(1)

The Corporate Counselor
In this article, John Eustice discusses strategies for responding to Rule 30(b)(1) notices when served to a corporate officer or director to be produced for deposition. Although most courts have interpreted Rule 30(b)(1) to allow such depositions, there is another option that can empower institutional parties to preclude or at least place limits on an opposing party's ability to demand depositions of named officers, directors, and managing agents.
Related Files
Related Links